Loann Massard vs Adrien Gobat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Mar at 03:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Massard vs A. Gobat

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Massard 1 - 1 Gobat
They have played 4 sets in total, with Loann Massard winning 2 and Adrien Gobat winning 2. The last match between Loann Massard and Adrien Gobat was at the M15 Poitiers, 07-03-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Loann Massard getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Massard | 1 |
| Gobat | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Poitiers(03-07-25)
(R1) M15 Poitiers(03-06-24)
L. Massard vs A. Gobat H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.72% (90-91) | Career Total W/L | 57.82% (122-89) |
| 1 | Indoor | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Massard vs A. Gobat Match Preview:
Get ready for a tennis match that promises to be more thrilling than a squirrel on caffeine! Gobat's been bouncing around the court like a hyperactive kangaroo, snagging a cheeky 49.45% of second serve points in recent form. Meanwhile, Massard isn't exactly twiddling his racquet, securing 45.04% of those pesky points. Fun fact: There's a strong correlation between this stat and predicting who’ll reign victorious, and we're watching closely!
Not stopping at serves, let’s dive into the world of returns where Gobat has been pocketing 47.3% of his opponent's second serve points. Massard, not to be outdone, grabbed 49.77%! When first serves come firing, Gobat’s caught 28.1%, while Massard casually caught 23.89%. Who knew catching tennis balls could be so humorous? And that my friends, is the stat which plays the devil on our shoulders whispering about who’s the favorite.
Under those nail-biting pressure moments, where palms are sweaty and racquets extra slippery, Gobat saves 48.08% of breakpoints as calm as a monk, while Massard saves 55.91% like it’s his day job. Last year, Gobat played like a wizard with a wand, winning 62.86% of matches, whereas Massard waved his own magic wand to win 61.54%. You can bet your lucky racquet that these stats paint quite the picture for our upcoming showdown.
Now, let's kick it on surfaces. Gobat seems to tango best on Hard surfaces with a win rate of a dazzling 68%, but stumbles a bit on I.hard with a 46% win rate. Massard does a moonwalk on I.hard with 58% wins but treats Clay like it’s quicksand, winning only 31%. Decisions, decisions! It’s like choosing between cookies and cake, based solely on their stats!
Diving into the flashy world of tournaments, Gobat’s tour around the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K sees him winning a cool 64.71%, all while Massard swings his way around the same level for a 63.79% win rate. A lot of number crunching and yet, they’ve locked horns once, with Gobat getting the better of Massard without breaking a sweat, winning 2 sets to zip.
In their previous entanglement, Gobat nabbed the win with a score of 6-4, 7-6(5) at the M 15 Poitiers like it was a casual day at the park. Tiebreak situations? Only one so far, and Gobat snatched that one like candy from a baby. Talk about superpowers! Now, in those deciding sets with the world watching? Gobat has a win rate of 42%, whereas Massard edges out a bit higher at 45%.
Meanwhile, at the pressure point galore stations, where conversion is key, Gobat turned 28.8% of breakpoint chances into reality, while Massard ace'd it at 35.15%. If you're the type who loves a cheeky live bet, these are the numbers you want to stow away in your clever head.
With all this statistical jazz playing on repeat, and a sprinkle of historical rivalry, the match ahead is lining up to be as unpredictable as a cat on a hot tin roof. But if there’s any sense amidst this numerical symphony, our chubby crystal ball nudges towards Gobat claiming the night’s glory, just by a whisker - or in tennis terms, by a tiebreak!
Loann Massard vs Adrien Gobat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Massard vs A. Gobat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 24 | Games Won | 24 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:0:11 | Average Match Time | 2:0:11 |
| 66% (109/165) | 1st Serve % | 52% (77/147) |
| 72% (78/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (53/77) |
| 36% (20/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (38/70) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 32% (6/19) |
| 38% (56/147) | Return Points Win % | 41% (67/165) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Massard Recent Matches Played
A. Gobat Recent Matches Played

L. Massard vs A. Gobat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.72% (90/91) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.82% (122/89) |
| 50.60% (212/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.86% (267/211) |
| 50.96% (2060/1982) | Games Win/Loss | 51.65% (2374/2222) |
| 42.11% (16/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.71% (55/30) |
| 32.00% (8/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.26% (33/20) |
| 55.93% (66/52) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.58% (34/39) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 776 | Aces Total | 506 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 373 | Total Double Faults | 538 |
| 1:31:3 | Average Match Time | 1:31:6 |
| 349.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.96 |
| 60% (6466/10821) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7392/12436) |
| 70% (4505/6466) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5057/7392) |
| 47% (2052/4355) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2473/5044) |
| 42% (433/1037) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (516/1232) |
| 39% (4155/10580) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4883/12171) |
| 29.41% (5/12) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 51.83% (85/79) | Futures W/L | 59.07% (114/79) |
| 49% (87/176) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (121/210) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (26/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (35/70) |
| 43% (24/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (33/57) |
| 81% (97/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (118/108) |
| 18% (97/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (118/10) |
| 12% (84/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (93/14) |